Re: scratch/igc as a feature branch [was: Re: igc: trying to chase a crash]

[Stefan Kangas]

Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com> writes:

> Sounds good to me.

Thanks!

Andrea, could you please move ahead with this now?

> We'd still need to worry about git history at some point before
> merging the branch to master, I guess?  No reason to do so now,
> though.

I don't think there is anything to worry about.  My understanding is
that Git history can be kept as is, and merging to master is done with
"git merge".  The merge commit should have a complete ChangeLog though.

What am I missing?