[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scratch/igc abefefd4f88: Add a staticpro in search.c (bug#75459)
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
Re: scratch/igc abefefd4f88: Add a staticpro in search.c (bug#75459) |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:47:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Gerd Moellmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> branch: scratch/igc
>> commit abefefd4f887c8b282da4a848367ab89fe17ce41
>> Author: Gerd Möllmann <gerd@gnu.org>
>> Commit: Gerd Möllmann <gerd@gnu.org>
>>
>> Add a staticpro in search.c (bug#75459)
>>
>> * src/search.c (syms_of_search): Staticpro a Lisp_Object member in
>> searchbufs for HAVE_MPS.
>> ---
>> src/search.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/search.c b/src/search.c
>> index 36a932b015b..98d11131e31 100644
>> --- a/src/search.c
>> +++ b/src/search.c
>> @@ -3446,6 +3446,11 @@ syms_of_search (void)
>> staticpro (&searchbufs[i].regexp);
>> staticpro (&searchbufs[i].f_whitespace_regexp);
>> staticpro (&searchbufs[i].syntax_table);
>> +#ifdef HAVE_MPS
>> + /* Strictly speaking, this is also necessary for the old GC,
>> + unless one would prove it isn't. Don't rock the boat. */
>> + staticpro (&searchbufs[i].buf.translate);
>> +#endif
>
> Is there any harm from doing this for the old GC also?
No :-)