Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
>> Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com,  pipcet@protonmail.com,  spd@toadstyle.org,
>>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:05:09 +0100
>> 
>> >> Maybe, after reading igc.org, that is acceptable maintenance-wise?
>> >
>> > Can you show a patch?
>> 
>> We haven't talked about what to do the sample after get_backtrace yet.
>
> OK, let's talk about that.  What did you have in mind?
>
>> And I'm not sure if you accept the approach now or not, TBH. If that's
>> not the case, we can stop here and save time.
>
> I don't think I have a clear idea what this approach would be.  I
> thought showing a patch was a good way of getting us on the same page.
> But if that needs a lot of work, then maybe describe the idea in some
> detail first?

Will do if the process_pending_signals turns out not to work. If that
works, it would be even better, I think.