[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A new filter-based customization interface
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: A new filter-based customization interface |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Dec 2024 23:43:39 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > > > > I added a screenshot of what such an interface might look like
(which
> > > > > is better than words). https://justpaste.it/fdau4.
> > > >
> > > > That site seems to depend on nonfree Javascript code. Those of us
who
> > > > block nonfree Javascript. or block Javascript entirely, cannot see
> > > > whatever you meant to show us.
> >
> > > The website works entirely without JavaScript.
> >
> > I just tried it again and verified that LibreJS reported blocked scripts.
> > (They are blocked for not being labeled with a free liecense.
> >
> The website loads without JS if you encounter such an issue try loading
> without JS.
I am not sure what that concretely means.
What exactly do you man by "loading without JS">
I _normally_ disable nonfree JS, by using LibreJS. Are you trying to
say that the site fails with LibreJS but would work properly if I were
to disable JavaScrpt 100% instead?
If the site works that way, it is a pain in the neck, but it can
be fixed.
Why do you keep talking about the JavaScript which you don't
> like to load?
That sentence seems to stretch words which are not contradictory so as
to accuse them of being contradictory.
Please don't do that.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)