Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[tomas]

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 04:14:37AM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:

[...]

> The grammars don't make any backwards compatibility guarantees. There have 
> been multiple Emacs bugs arising from grammars unilaterally changing terminal 
> names and such. ISTM the only way to guarantee compatibility is to vendor the 
> whole stack.

Since you asked in another thread: you just gave me
another strong reason to steer clear of TS.

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature