[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:05:06 +0200 |
> From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, pipcet@protonmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org, acorallo@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 09:23:11 +0100
>
> I think, SIGIO might cause trouble.
Why do you think so? Its handler does almost nothing, just sets a
flag (if you ignore the Android-specific stuff there).
> But that async IO code in process.c is sooo hard to read. I wonder
> if it would be simpler with threads, e.g. one thread per
> Lisp_Process.
Heh, see w32proc.c.
- Re: Some experience with the igc branch, (continued)
- Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/23
- Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/24
- SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/24
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/24
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/24
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/25
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/25
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/25
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/25
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/24
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/24
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/27
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/27
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/27
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/27
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Pip Cet, 2024/12/27
- Re: SIGPROF + SIGCHLD and igc, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/29