[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:20:06 -0800 |
> On Dec 22, 2024, at 4:44 PM, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> wrote:
>
> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Continuing from the tree-sitter maternity thread, I cooked up some
>> script to go over each builtin tree-sitter mode, clone the grammars it
>> uses, and check whether the font-lock queries are compatible with the
>> latest version of the grammar. If everything works fine, the script
>> adds some comment in the source file listing the version that was
>> checked.
>
> Oh that sounds very good. This could be a good workaround for the sort
> of fast and lose nature of tree-sitter.
>
Great. Do you think the “verified version” comment will be helpful for
packagers?
Yuan
Message not available
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar,
Yuan Fu <=
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Peter Oliver, 2024/12/24
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/24
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/24
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/25
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/25
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/25
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Peter Oliver, 2024/12/26
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/26
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/28
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/30