[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make Signal handling patch platform-dependent?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Make Signal handling patch platform-dependent? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2024 17:11:41 +0200 |
> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>, Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:54:36 +0100
>
> Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com> writes:
>
> > If we come up with a solution to the signal issue which works but
> > requires the creation of extra threads, would that prevent the merge?
>
> I think that's for Eli to answer.
I don't see why extra threads would be a problem, as long as they
don't use the Lisp machine or any parts of the global state. We
already have several threads on MS-Windows, including for emulating
Posix signals, so I don't see why adding C threads on Posix systems
would be "verboten".
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Helmut Eller, 2024/12/22
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/22
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/23
Discussion with MPS people, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/23
Re: Discussion with MPS people, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Pip Cet, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Pip Cet, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Pip Cet, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/23
Re: Some experience with the igc branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/23