Re: Alternative defaults for visually impaired users? (was: [RFC] The best way to choose an "action" at point: context-menu-mode, transient, which-key or embark? (was: Fwd: Org-cite: Replace basic follow-processor with transient menu?))

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > I guess that Emacsspeak already provides some good defaults for blind,
  > thanks to T.V. Raman's continuous dedication.
  > But maybe we want things to be available in vanilla Emacs as well?

It depends what "available" means.  If it means having a package
that would install suitable different bindings and settings, it sounds
fine in principle -- but does Raman want to maintain them that way?
It might be a bigger change for him than for users of his work.

                                                                      Not
  > just for blind, but also settings with large font sizes.

I have a feeling that the changes for large fonts would be totally
dissimilar to those for screen reading.  I'm not an expert, though,
bu does anyone actually _know_ whether they have much in common?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)