[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:55:21 +0200 |
> From: Nicolas Desprès <nicolas.despres@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 15:06:40 +0100
> Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> > Because these variables define the minimum size to allow splitting, not
> the order by which split
> orientations
> > are tried.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand: does it mean you are unable to change the
> value of split-height-threshold to cause the function to split
> horizontally? If so, can you show a recipe?
>
> I can by setting split-height-threshold to nil, but then it will never split
> vertically.
You can also set it to a large enough value, no?
> The current implementation first tries to split vertically. If it fails, it
> tries to split horizontally then it
> falls back to vertical splitting.
>
> So to split horizontally, it must first fail to split vertically.
Yes.
> The default threshold values are fine. I just want the default behavior to
> try the longest edge first.
> This way when both splitting would have succeeded (according to their
> respective threshold value) it will
> split first where there is more room.
But N columns are not equivalent to N lines. IOW, if you have a
window that is (N+1)xN, splitting horizontally is not necessarily TRT.
Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge, martin rudalics, 2024/12/14
Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/14