[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: Proposal: Include C Manual from RMS in Emacs git,
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: Proposal: Include C Manual from RMS in Emacs git, and/or release |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Dec 2024 08:15:56 +0200 |
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> CC: "jb@jeremybryant.net" <jb@jeremybryant.net>,
> "emacs-devel@gnu.org"
> <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
> "rms@gnu.org" <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:09:49 +0000
>
> > Actually, I believe most people read the HTML
> > version of the Texinfo documentation.
>
> Interesting. Do you have some quantitative data
> about the percentage of readings of HTML vs Info
> by (non-Emacs) users?
>
> I don't think otherwise - just wondering what
> backs up your belief about this.
My evidence is that when people report problems with GNU manuals, they
almost always show a URL of the HTML documentation.
Also, the number of bug reports about the stand-alone Info reader is
almost zero.
I don't have any other data, but I cannot think about any other way
people who don't use Emacs can read the documentation of GCC, GDB, GNU
Make, and other GNU tools.
- Re: [External] : Re: Proposal: Include C Manual from RMS in Emacs git, and/or release,
Eli Zaretskii <=