[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default lexical-binding to t
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Default lexical-binding to t |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Nov 2024 13:42:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> Apologies in advance if this has been suggested and discarded before, or
> if I am missing something obvious, but wouldn't it be possible to have
> an additional level of indirection with a new variable,
> default-lexical-binding, settable in, say, early-init.el? It's not a
> real solution, but at least people with lots of trouble with the new
> default could just set it off in one place.
The patch I submitted in the relevant bugreport allows that.
I'm not sure how much we want to advertise it, tho. I was thinking of
keeping it only as a kind of testing/debugging tool, a bit like
`bidi-display-reordering`.
Stefan
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, (continued)
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Andrea Corallo, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Sean Whitton, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Jim Porter, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, John Yates, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/06
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Christopher Howard, 2024/11/07