Re: [PATCH] EWW - use revert--buffer-function to reload, and allow reload in eww-list-buffer

[Sebastián Monía]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> I didn't yet have time to read your discussion and make up my mind.  I
> was waiting for you to reach some agreement, but it seems you are
> still discussing the various aspects?

I was wondering if there was an official project stance on using vtable
or tabulated-list. Like there's a preference for seq vs cl-lib (where
both apply) for example.

> Are there any downsides to using vtable?

None that I know of, and as Adam suggested, vtables are sometimes easier
to handle.
It doesn't make much of a difference in this case, though, the table is
pretty simple.

Attached a new patch that used vtable, and also adds the
(eww-buffer-list) function that Jim mentioned before.
Once this one is merged (after review & corrections :) etc.) I can take
the same vtable approach for eww-bookmarks.

Thank you,
Seb

0001-Use-vtable-in-eww-list-buffers-add-function-eww-buff.patch
Description: eww-list-buffers and eww-buffer-list