Re: Add function to rotate/transpose all windows

[Juri Linkov]

>> I recommend to put all these related transform commands on the dedicated
>> prefix map 'C-x w t', e.g. 'C-x w t t' for transpose-windows, etc.
>
> I see, then imo 'C-x w r' would probably be better, nemonic for
> rerarrange.  I don't see any connection between rotating and flipping
> windows under transposing catagory.

Here is an existing example to get inspiration.
There are two keymaps on images:

image-map:
i r             image-rotate
i h             image-flip-horizontally
i v             image-flip-vertically

image-mode-map:
s 0             image-transform-reset-to-initial
s b             image-transform-fit-both
s f             image-mode-fit-frame
s h             image-transform-fit-to-height
s i             image-transform-fit-to-width
s m             image-transform-set-smoothing
s o             image-transform-reset-to-original
s p             image-transform-set-percent
s r             image-transform-set-rotation
s s             image-transform-set-scale
s w             image-transform-fit-to-window

>> because for example recently we discussed addition of new maps
>> 'C-x w d <arrow>' to delete a window in direction, and
>> 'C-x w s <arrow>' to split a window in direction.
>> But all these keys are already taken:
>> 'C-x w d' for 'toggle-window-dedicated' and
>> 'C-x w s' for 'window-toggle-side-windows'.
>
> Is there really need to be so strict, I mean, having semi-nonsencial but
> useful keybindings is better than not having them in the first place.
>
> For example the split window in direction could be 'C-x w n <arrow>',
> 'n' for new window in direction.  I would rather this than not having
> it.  (tbh having four arrows not very useful, as C-x 2 and C-x 3 already
> deal with 2 of them).

'n' for new is a nice mnemonics indeed.

Or maybe better to move the toggle commands to the prefix 'C-x w t':

'C-x w t d' for 'toggle-window-dedicated' and
'C-x w t s' for 'window-toggle-side-windows'.