Re: packages submissions : ob-sql-session and org-blog

[Phil Estival]

* [2024-09-11 09:24] Philip Kaludercic:
> Phil Estival <pe@7d.nz> writes:
> > Hello
on ob-sql-session
> > that I'd like to submit to ELPA, with
> > the advise and approval of emacs-devel.
> Just to be sure, you mean GNU ELPA (not NonGNU ELPA), right?

I think so. The ownership transferred to the FSF and a copyright
assignment. One word about the license notice: I'm in agreement
with Stephan's opinion:
> historically we have accepted both "is part of GNU Emacs" and "is NOT
> part of GNU Emacs".  IMO the better choice is to say neither.

on org-blog :
> Hmm, I don't know if we have any literate programs on ELPA yet.  If you
> prefer that style of development, that is fair, but what I would suggest
> would be to add a Makefile and extract the elisp at "compile-time", or
> in the case of ELPA when the tarball is being built.
> skimming through the .org file (which most certainly should /not/ be
> the README btw) the code could also use some cleaning
> up, at least if the intention is to publish it as a generic package.

> The functions don't seem to adhere to a specific conventional namespace,

> I have my doubts as to how much sense it would make to try and convert
> this personal code into a proper package, instead of starting over again :/

Understood. I'll be back with something cleaner, reconsider
where it can rely on the existing structures, and seek more advice
on the Org mailing list. Thanks for everything.

Phil