emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Emba (was: MPS: Win64 testers?)


From: Michael Albinus
Subject: Emba (was: MPS: Win64 testers?)
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 19:32:01 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com> writes:

Hi Pip,

> Oh. That's a pity. Were those requests public? If so, do you have a link?

Not at hand. IIRC, I've asked mainly on the
<emacs-build-automation@gnu.org> ML.

> Would switching to forgejo be an option, maybe? That _claims_ to be
> easy to set up, and it's also the platform I'm playing with right now;
> and there seems to be a strong focus on keeping the project free in
> more than the technical sense, which is what irritates me about
> gitlab.com.

We don't have a problem with GitLab a priori. It has served for several
years. But recently, we see many authorization failures I have no
explanation for, and we run out of space permanently, although there are
daily prune cron jobs. Somebody with solid GitLab and/or Docker
experience whould be able to fix this.

> No idea whether resources for such experiments are available though,
> and I don't know about the use of GNU resources for CI for free
> reimplementations of non-free operating systems, either with a wholly
> free toolchain (Wine) or a decidedly non-free SDK (Android-based); my
> understanding is that any significant development work for macOS
> requires non-free Apple software and a developer's license that you
> have to pay for, so I assume that one's out of the question.

ATM, we run CI only for GNU/Linix. There are no plans yetto extend this
for other terget systems.

> I can volunteer to look at things as a one-off effort, but can't take
> over any regular or recurring maintenance work at this point.

Thanks! I'm occupied the next days, but later this week, I'll come back
with this issue.

> Pip

Best regards, Michael.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]