Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg]

If we do this, I think we should do it basic first.

No new representation or new infix notation or anything like
that, nothing too fancy, just implement a bunch of stuff - but
in a systematic way, of course.

All will have to be discussed of course but as for me, I don't
see it as too advanced from the get-go, not in terms of math
and absolutely not in terms of Elisp.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal