Re: MPS: weak hash tables

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com,  eller.helmut@gmail.com,  yantar92@posteo.net,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 13:19:09 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Balancing only changes the tree structure, without freeing nodes, AFAIR.
> >> But that could be wrong. It's been a long time since I looked closer at
> >> that tree.
> >
> > We free nodes in sweep_intervals.
> 
> I think that is handled in igc.c by intervals becoming unreachable.

They will not become unreachable unless we unchain them, as is done in
sweep_intervals.  Right?