[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windm
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:46:38 +0000 |
> >> I didn't manage to read the entire thread, but isn't the main issue with
> >> C-x 4 <arrow key> that it is a relatively long key chord with a certain
> >> travel distance on the keyboard for a quick operation? If it is easier
> >> to press C-x o a few times (which `repeat-mode' makes even easier), then
> >> there is little point in adding a default binding, I feel.
> >
> > I assumed the proposal was for _repeating_
> > keys after a prefix key: C-x 4 <down> <down>...
> > or even a mixture of arrow directions:
> > C-x 4 <down> <right> <up>, <up>...
>
> No, then my message wouldn't make any sense.
Which is why I replied. Your msg would only
make sense if someone actually meant to say
that they would use `C-x 4 <down>' then use
that whole key sequence again to repeat the
movement, etc.
Whether it's your message that doesn't make
sense or the original proposal that doesn't
make sense, I don't know - presumably one of
the two (at least).
My point was that you can have rapid repetition
of a series of actions (even different actions)
even if you start the series using an unhandy,
non-repeatable or hard-to-repeat prefix key.
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/23
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/24
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/06/23
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Juri Linkov, 2024/06/24
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/26
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/30
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Juri Linkov, 2024/06/23