[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPS: Forwording symbols
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
Re: MPS: Forwording symbols |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:25:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Can we use similar reasoning to remove fix_fwd? If predicate is
>> guaranteed to be a builtin symbol, then we don't need to do anything for
>> the Lisp_Buffer_Objfwd case.
>
> A side note: If some parts of the code now has to be careful about
> handling built-in/non-builtin symbols, would it make sense to add some
> relevant assertions to the debug build? Otherwise, future changes in
> Emacs may accidentally introduce hard-to-debug crashes.
That's why I'd much prefer an enum.
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, (continued)
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/23
Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols,
Gerd Möllmann <=