[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPS: profiler
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
Re: MPS: profiler |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:54:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> Also, can 'static struct profiler_log cpu', which is being worked on
> by record_backtrace, be affected by MPS in any way?
I'd guess that just "touching" Lisp objects in the SIGPROF handler can
be problematic because these objects themselves can be behind a barrier,
either the same that MPS is currently working on when it got interrupted
or another one.
- MPS: profiler, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/20
- Re: MPS: profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/20
- Re: MPS: profiler, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/20
- Re: MPS: profiler, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/20
- Re: MPS: profiler, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/20
- Re: MPS: profiler, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler,
Gerd Möllmann <=
- Re: MPS: profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: profiler, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21