Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> We never really supported Windows 95, only Windows 98.  So I don't
> think it makes sense to introduce all this complexity now, just to add
> Windows 95 to the soup.
>
> Or are you saying that there are problems on Windows 98 as well?

Probably, yes.  The Windows 95 portions of this change are only a
fractoon of the whole, in all likelihood, but I cannot swear to either
possibility as KernelEx dlls export plenty of functions called from
w32*.c, and my searching revealed no symbol list for Windows 98 online,
leaving me with no choice but to err on the side of caution.