Re: A few questions about c++-ts-mode.

[Ergus]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 05:19:53PM GMT, Yuan Fu wrote:
> > On May 7, 2024, at 3:59 PM, Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > There are a few differences between c++-ts-mode and c++-mode that I
> > don't know if should be reported or they are like that due to some
> > design choice.
>
> AFAIK, the design goal of c++-ts-mode is to follow c++-mode whenever possible.
>
> > 1. namespaces are not fontified like in c-mode (i.e in std::string the
> >  `std` used to have font-lock-constant-face while `string` used to have
> >  font-lock-type-face). It seems like tresitter identifies properly them
> >  like (namespace_identifier) and (type_identifier)
>
> Then we probably want to fontify namespaces in constant face. Or perhaps add a 
> namespace-face that inherits from constant face.
>
> > 2. Doc string comments are fontified like normal comments. It looks like
> >  treesiter does not recognize them at all. Is this something we need to
> >  report to treesitter or we need to workaround it in emacs side?
>
> I’m working on that. I think the best way is to workaround it in Emacs.
>
> > 3. macros like `#if defined(something)` fontifies the whole macro with
> >  same font (the `identifier` used to have no colors in c++-mode)
>
> We should update the fontification to leave out the identifier.
>
> Yuan

Hi Yuan:

Forgot to mention that

4. enum and enum class indentation is not working either

struct send {
     |
};

class send {
     |
};

enum send {
|
};

enum class send {
     |
};