[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexical-bindings... is that what we indent?
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: lexical-bindings... is that what we indent? |
Date: |
Sun, 5 May 2024 15:46:03 +0200 |
5 maj 2024 kl. 14.48 skrev Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com>:
> a color emoji does not quite say “press me” the way a colored
> underscored plain text label or a 3D-boxed button would.
Eli is entirely right, and so are you. In interaction design, our intentions
count for very little.
The icon is not obviously a button, and even if it were, a wrong-entrance
traffic sign doesn't say 'suppress warning'.
The context and positioning of the icon are more those of a bullet, which is
not generally considered a target for interaction. But having an inert bullet
or other conspicuous marker there does make sense, because it marks the start
of a warning and makes the buffer easier to read at a glance.
A button for disabling is useful, but it should be clear what it does, and it
probably makes more sense to put it at the end of the entry. (Space is not a
concern there, so let's not use words rather than a symbol.)
This suggests that something like
* Warning: beware of the leopard! [Disable]
would probably work better. Here is a tentative patch.
warning-bullet-and-button.diff
Description: Binary data