[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objed maintenance
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Objed maintenance |
Date: |
Thu, 02 May 2024 17:09:40 +0000 |
Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:
> On 5/2/24 01:02, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Philip,
>>>
>>>> Abstractly: My advice is my advice, it is inherently biased. I take
>>>> that position, because of my experience, which is why I refuse to
>>>> install packages with more than 1-~2 transitive dependencies (I was
>>>> recently once again shocked by "ement").
>>>
>>> Would you please explain what you mean here?
>> Just that I recently wanted to try out ement, but decided not to do
>> so
>> when I saw the list of dependencies.
>
> I don't understand. There are only a few, and they're all on GNU
> ELPA. Which ones do you object to, and why?
I am trying to give Amy an example of why to avoid dependencies, because
people like me don't look at
Requires: emacs-27.1, map-2.1, persist-0.5, plz-0.6, taxy-0.10,
taxy-magit-section-0.13, svg-lib-0.2.5, transient-0.3.7
and say it is only a few, if my limit is at 1-2 /transitive/
dependencies. (In addition to that, you know that I have strong
opinions on Emacs package names and do not what to install a package
called "taxy", even though I know that this is probably just my
opinion).
--
Philip Kaludercic on peregrine
Re: Objed maintenance, Amy Grinn, 2024/05/02