Re: master 930c578c104: ; Improvements to PEG documentation

[Eric Abrahamsen]

Michael Heerdegen via "Emacs development discussions."
<emacs-devel@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello Eric,
>
> why do you use the term "lambda form" here?
>
> | +@defun peg-run peg-matcher &optional failure-function success-function
> | +This function accepts a single @var{peg-matcher}, which is the result of
> | +calling @code{peg} (see below) on a named rule, usually the entry-point
> | +of a larger grammar.
> | +
> | +At the end of parsing, one of @var{failure-function} or
> | +@var{success-function} is called, depending on whether the parsing
> | +succeeded or not.  If @var{success-function} is called, it is passed a
> | +lambda form that runs all the actions collected on the stack during
> | +parsing -- by default this lambda form is simply executed.
>
> AFAIU the function is just passed a function.  An anonymous function
> maybe, but certainly a function value, not a function form - so just
> daily business - or do I miss something?

No, you're right, I was probably just looking at the code and describing
what I was seeing.