[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Curious: Why is there no binding for replace-string "out of the box"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Curious: Why is there no binding for replace-string "out of the box"? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 21:47:36 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> more importantly replace-string is not bound. That is what I was trying to
say>
The useful key bindings are limited, so we have to choose the most
important uses of them. Given there is a binding for quere-replace,
and you can get the effect of replace-string with quere-replace followed by !,
I decided there was no need to use up a binding for replace-string.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: Curious: Why is there no binding for replace-string "out of the box"?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/07