[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond*
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: cond* |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:13:49 +0000 |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:49 AM Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> Please send me feedback about this proposed change. If you like it,
> if you dislike it, or if you think it makes little difference, I would
> like to hear that from you.
If subsequent clauses can still access bindings in PATTERN,
then my previous doubts and criticism remain, and this change
makes little difference.
- Re: cond*, (continued)
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/20
- Re: cond*, João Távora, 2023/12/21
- RE: [External] : Re: cond*, Drew Adams, 2023/12/21
- Re: [External] : Re: cond*, João Távora, 2023/12/21
- Re: [External] : Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/23
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/23
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/12/21
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/23
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/12/25
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/18
- Re: cond*,
João Távora <=
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/21
- Re: cond*, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/12/22
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/24
- Re: cond*, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/12/25
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/26
- Re: cond*, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/12/27
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/28
- RE: [External] : Re: cond*, Drew Adams, 2023/12/19
- Re: [External] : Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/20
- Re: [External] : Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/20