Re: Ellama comments

[Philip Kaludercic]

The development mailing list got dropped, I've added it again.

Sergey Kostyaev <sskostyaev@gmail.com> writes:

> Today I finally got signed CA. What’s my next steps to move ellama to GNU 
> Elpa?

The first thing that you'll need to do is to update the copyright
string, and replace it with

  ;; Copyright (C) 2023  Free Software Foundation, Inc.

and bump the version header.

Unless we find any further issues, I can just add the package to
elpa.git and that is that.

> I have fixed most of your comments and fix customization group
> soon. Spinner instead of progress-reporter because it was contribution
> from other person. And I like it - it has high level api. And it’s
> informative enough.

OK, if you say so, it just seems like an unnecessary dependency to me,
that might also be a soft dependency.

> Best Regards,
> Sergei Kostiaev
>
>> 3 нояб. 2023 г., в 00:24, Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> написал(а):
>> 
>> Sergey Kostyaev <sskostyaev@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Hi, Philip. I'm honored. It's OK for me in general. I need to check my
>>> job contract about signature for GNU Elpa. And I'm in Russia now, can
>>> this be a problem? I need some time to investigate your comments. I
>>> will reply more specifically a few days later.
>> 
>> I don't expect that there should be an issue wrt to Russia, but I cannot
>> say for sure.
>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Sergey Kostyaev 
>>> 
>>> 2 ноября 2023 г. 11:23:04 UTC, Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> пишет:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, I was looking into proposing the inclusion of Ellama to NonGNU ELPA
>>>> (or ideally GNU ELPA if you are OK with it), but I first wanted to send
>>>> you a few comments on the code:
>>>> 
>> 
>> Sergey Kostyaev <sskostyaev@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> About job contract all fine. What should I do with code by other
>>> contributors to move project to GNU Elpa? Are there any cheatsheets
>>> about it? About code comments I will reply later.
>> 
>> It is necessary that all significant contributors have signed the FSF
>> copyright assignment (CA), but from what I see you seem to be the only one
>> that would qualify as such (more than 15 lines of substantial code is
>> the way this is usually approximated).
>> 
>> Have you already signed the CA?  If not, send an email to
>> emacs-devel@gnu.org to request the form.
>> 
>>> 2 ноября 2023 г. 11:23:04 UTC, Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> пишет:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, I was looking into proposing the inclusion of Ellama to NonGNU ELPA
>>>> (or ideally GNU ELPA if you are OK with it), but I first wanted to send
>>>> you a few comments on the code:
>>>>