Re: seq.el and the complexity of Emacs Lisp.

[Jim Porter]

On 11/9/2023 6:31 PM, João Távora wrote:
> Right, probably because in both Common Lisp and Elisp that function
> is called ELT and is a very old function.  So there was no need to
> add it to cl-lib.el.  keep in mind cl-lib.el comes from cl.el which
> didn't have the "cl-" prefix.  So Common Lisp functions that were
> exactly the same in Emacs Lisp obviously weren't in cl.el, so that's
> why there's no cl-elt.

I suppose that's what you get when you just try to learn the sum total 
of (Emacs) Lisp via osmosis. :) Now I know about a new function, though.