Re: seq.el and the complexity of Emacs Lisp.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 14:50:56 +0100
> 
> Harald Judt wrote:
> 
> > My response was targeted more at the general denial to code
> > changes, not about this discussion about cl-lib.
> > Your assumption that every change needs to be driven by
> > benefit seems a bit short-sighted to me. It is probably good
> > enough when you want to build something fast without having
> > to care about it much later. Maybe it holds when you lack
> > time because then not wasting time is a priority. But if you
> > want to build something for long-term use, it might not be
> > an optimal solution. Having to depend on immediate benefits
> > to change anything also loses importance when time is not
> > that much of a priority.
> 
> Well, now we are getting into the whole "revolution vs
> evolution" discussion.

Once again, please take this discussion to emacs-tangents.  It doesn't
belong here.