[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to u
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:31:23 +0000 |
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 3:20 PM Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> There's a difference between (1) adding &key to
> Elisp generally and (2) letting more functions
> take advantage of :key and :test, in particular.
Good point. Very good point. It's just
that (1) happens to be a very good way to do (2).
But you're 100% right for sure it's not the only
way and (2) is ultimately what I'm after as well.
> (We have :test for `make-hash-table', but I
> think that's about it.)
We have keyword arguments for more functions,
make-process, json-serialize are two that
come to mind, pretty sure there are others.
> It would be nice to be able to provide for
> their use in user-defined functions, without
> any need to load anything from `cl-*'.
So why not introduce a 'definitelynotcl-defun'
macro with support for '&definitelynotkey' that
does that? ;-)
João
Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, João Távora, 2023/11/02
- Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Emanuel Berg, 2023/11/02
- RE: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Drew Adams, 2023/11/02
- Re: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/07
- RE: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Drew Adams, 2023/11/07
- RE: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Bob Rogers, 2023/11/07
- Re: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/08
Re: [External] : Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib?, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/11/08