[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Nov 2023 17:57:40 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>, h.judt@gmx.at,
>> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 19:23:32 +0530
>>
>> [புதன் நவம்பர் 01, 2023] Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>> >> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> >> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:21:51 +0000
>> >>
>> > What I would like to ask is whether Harald tried to calculate SHA256
>> > using Emacs's own primitives, instead of relying on an external
>> > program, which may or may not be installed.
>>
>> >From OP,
>>
>> The only external requirement is a checksum program like md5 or
>> sha256sum that generates a hash value from the contents of a file used
>> for comparison, because Emacs cannot do that in a performance-efficient
>> way.
>>
>> So I guess the answer is no.
>
> I'd like to see the numbers which led to the conclusion that
> performance was prohibitive.
>
> And even if the performance is indeed much worse, it could be a
> fallback in case the program is not available -- which would IMO be
> much better than simply failing to provide the functionality in that
> case.
This is a cheap test on a 1.4GB ISO I had lying around:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(benchmark-run 1
(with-temp-buffer
(insert-file-contents-literally
"~/Downloads/haiku-r1beta4-x86_64-anyboot.iso")
(secure-hash 'sha512 (current-buffer))))
;; (44.389091035 1 1.5836082630000021)
(benchmark-run 1
(with-temp-buffer
(call-process "sha512sum" nil t nil (expand-file-name
"~/Downloads/haiku-r1beta4-x86_64-anyboot.iso"))
(goto-char (point-min))
(and (looking-at (rx bos (+ alnum)))
(match-string 0))))
;; (5.155846791 0 0.0)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, (continued)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/03
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/03
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/10
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/10
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/23
Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Visuwesh, 2023/11/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/08
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Harald Judt, 2023/11/09
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, tomas, 2023/11/09
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dired-duplicates, tomas, 2023/11/09