[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org mode and Emacs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Org mode and Emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2023 21:50:56 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> The .org falls in the category of lightweight markup formats and I
> believe it should stick close to this definition.
If people keep this unchanged, Org mode will remain useful for the
tasks it can do today. But it won't be able to do the job for which
we now use Texinfo.
There are many different Texinfo markup constructs, so to do the job
of Texinfo, Org mode would need to be able to distinguish them all.
So the basic question is: to extend Org mode to do that job, or not?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/06
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/06
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/06
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/06
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/07
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/09
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/08
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/09
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/09
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/08
Re: Org mode and Emacs,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/03