[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:49:19 +0300 |
> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:41:49 -0700
> Cc: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.org.uk>,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> > I don't think I understand what you suggest in practical terms. What
> > does it mean "additional look up for only xxx.0.0"? and why only
> > xxx.0.0?
>
> I was suggesting that we do recognize ABI versions, but since tree-sitter
> grammars don’t really have a ABI version, and the version extension in
> filenames are just there by convention (of Fedora), we can expect the version
> extension to be always 0.0, should there be one.
If this will help distros, I don't mind.
But this should be limited to Posix hosts, since on Windows the story
is different, and on macOS it is also different (in another way),
AFAIR.
- Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Peter Oliver, 2023/04/16
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/16
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Yuan Fu, 2023/04/16
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/17
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Yuan Fu, 2023/04/17
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Peter Oliver, 2023/04/17
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Yuan Fu, 2023/04/24
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/24
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Yuan Fu, 2023/04/24
- Re: Versioned Tree-sitter parser libraries, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/24