[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Apr 2023 15:17:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> It's a bad name, that's all. The question is, can we come up with a
> significantly better one, given the generality of the feature?
I have created bug#62677: "Need to find a better name for
flyspell-prog-mode" for this issue.
Yes, we only need a better name. "flyspell-restricted-mode"?
But maybe let's better continue in that bug report.
Thx,
Michael.
- Re: jinx, (continued)
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Po Lu, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Emanuel Berg, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/01
Re: jinx, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/04/01
Re: jinx, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/04/01