[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it
|
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Apr 2023 09:24:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
>> But (info "(eintr) Strange Names") goes on:
>>
>> Besides being obsolete, the phrases have been completely irrelevant
>> for more than 25 years to anyone thinking about Lisp.
>
> I think that statement is too strong. The origins of things
> may cease to be crucial, but that doesn't make them
> "completely irrelevant" to the present.
One would think not ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, (continued)
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Michael Albinus, 2023/04/01
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/04/01
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Roland Winkler, 2023/04/02
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/02
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Emanuel Berg, 2023/04/03
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Andreas Schwab, 2023/04/03
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Roland Winkler, 2023/04/03
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Emanuel Berg, 2023/04/03
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/03
- Re: Arguing for a nilp function and where to put it,
Emanuel Berg <=