[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:32:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
> > Cc: rms@gnu.org, m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 09:42:40 +0200
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > > I'm not sure I understand item c), though: when and why would one want
> > > to spell-check macros and environments?
> >
> > Sorry, I meant to say arguments/bodies of macros/environments, not the
> > name of macros and environments.
>
> This is again not TeX-specific. Similar issues exist in Texinfo and
> in other markup languages. The annoyance is usually minor: it's
> enough to tell the speller to "accept" a word just once, since the
> number of markup codes is usually very small. But it would be nicer,
> of course, if Emacs could automatically skip markup in each major
> mode.
Wasn't that the purpose of `flyspell-prog-mode'?
Michael.
- Re: jinx, (continued)
- Re: jinx, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/02
- Re: jinx,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/05