emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: treesit indentation "blinking"


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: treesit indentation "blinking"
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:52:23 +0300

> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru,  dancol@dancol.org,  casouri@gmail.com,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org,  theo@thornhill.no,  geza.herman@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:43:49 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > This is a community project; without active collaboration of all the
> > contributors it wouldn't be such a success.  It should go without
> > saying that when someone proposes a change and the discussion then
> > concludes the change needs small adaptations, the person who proposed
> > the change will then go ahead and install those small adaptations.
> > Without such minimal collaboration, we as a project will get nowhere.
> 
> But "the discussion" _didn't_ conclude that.  You concluded that.  I'm
> not interesting in designing a defcustom, figuring out if it should be a
> boolean or a string, what the default should be, the docstring, the
> NEWS, etc for something which I think is a bug.

I asked you to become interested, but only in the defcustom.  I never
said anything about NEWS etc.  It's a simple request that should have
taken just a few moments of your time.  I was astonished by your flat
refusal.

And if that doesn't drive the point home, then I have nothing else to
say in this matter.

> I've never insisted other people to modify their work in ways they
> aren't confident in.

Sorry, but part of _my_ job here is to "insist".

> They would probably politely refuse it and maybe I
> would be slightly disappointed, but I could always do those changes
> myself if they are indeed easy. "Unfriendly" would be a really bizarre
> judgement to bestow on someone who volunteered time and code to my
> project and happened not to agree on a detail.

Most, if not all people whom I ask to make such small amendments (and
also similar other ones, like reword the doc strings, rename
variables, make some behavior optional, etc.) just do it.  I'm asked
to do similar things in other projects, where I'm just one of many
contributors.  Why you think it's unreasonable is beyond me.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]