Re: Question on getting tree-sitter matches

[Yuan Fu]

> On Mar 14, 2023, at 9:24 PM, Abin Simon <mail@meain.io> wrote:
> 
>> I see. We can add an optional argument to treesit-query-capture to toggle 
>> the “grouping” of matches, WDYT?
> 
> That would work for my current usecase.
> 
> With that said, I would like to point out that elisp-tree-sitter has two
> methods with one named captures returning a list of captures and one
> named matches which returns the "grouped" captures(along with pattern
> index). I'm not sure if these names have any semantic meaning.  From a
> quick scan of Neovim docs, they too seem to have two functions with
> similar names.

For your particular use, would it be better to add a separate function or a 
flag to treesit-query-capture?

Yuan