Re: Moving image commands to one submap

[Juri Linkov]

> When the image keymap was introduced, it only had a couple of commands,
> so triggering something by accident wasn't a major worry.  But it's now
> grown a large number of bindings, so people are hitting these commands
> more by accident.
>
> So I think we should move them all under one prefix, to make this less
> likely, and also then make the applicable commands use repeat-map.  For
> instance, `+ + +' would become `<something> + + +' etc (to increase the
> size of an image).
>
> But what should <something> be?  Something with "image" mnemonics and
> simple to type, but `C-i' isn't an option (because of confusion with
> `TAB').

I can't imagine a need to use self-inserting keys while point is on an image.
So why not just 'i' and then the image keymap with '+ - + - ...'
Or the same keymap directly without 'i'.