[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:10:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> It is to prevent errors when Mod4 is _not_ the super key. Very common
> on X (where Mod4 is commonly Hyper), and in fact it is caused by Mod4
> not being part of the Super virtual modifier in the compositor's XKB
> configuration.
But in this case, Emacs is running under wlroots, so there's no X, is
there?
Adding a workaround for what is apparently a really common problem here
sounds like something we just have to do.
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Akira Kyle, 2022/07/25
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/25
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Akira Kyle, 2022/07/26
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/26
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/07/27
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Akira Kyle, 2022/07/27