[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: utf-8-unix vs utf-8-emacs-unix
From: |
LdBeth |
Subject: |
Re: utf-8-unix vs utf-8-emacs-unix |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:11:06 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.2 (x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
>>>>> In <87tueqyfvs.fsf@163.com>
>>>>> "Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com> wrote:
Feng> Hello:
Feng> Before I use:
Feng> ;; Local Variables:
Feng> ;; coding: utf-8-unix
Feng> ;; End:
Feng> Can I change it to the below?
Feng> ;; Local Variables:
Feng> ;; coding: utf-8-emacs-unix
Feng> ;; End:
Feng> If I just save Chinese?
There's a description about utf-8-emacs from Emacs info manual, under
section Coding Systems:
> The coding system ‘emacs-internal’ (or ‘utf-8-emacs’, which is
> equivalent) means that the file contains non-ASCII characters stored
> with the internal Emacs encoding. This coding system handles
> end-of-line conversion based on the data encountered, and has the
> usual three variants to specify the kind of end-of-line conversion.
The internal encoding is a "superset" of unicode, so at least you can
expect it is compatible with the utf-8-unix.
--
LDB