[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2021 20:29:13 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:46:23 -0800
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
>
> What I experienced was a ton of diagnostics with both the Oracle Solaris
> and the IBM AIX C compilers, which made it difficult for me to see the
> real problems on those platforms (of which there were some).
Any reason why we should be concerned about these two platforms? They
are proprietary compilers on proprietary OSes.
> Conforming to the C standard doesn't affect behavior here (it possibly
> doesn't even change the machine code, though I didn't check this) so I
> considered the change to be a safe prophylactic.
Famous last words.
Please always raise the issue on the list before installing such
non-trivial changes on the release branch.
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/03
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Paul Eggert, 2021/12/03
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Paul Eggert, 2021/12/03
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/03
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Paul Eggert, 2021/12/03
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/04
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/04
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Po Lu, 2021/12/04
- Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays, Po Lu, 2021/12/03