Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Using kbd no longer needs to require edmacro, so it isn't entirely
> internal.

A NEWS entry saying "kbd can be used in built-in files" would be nice,
perhaps? 

> That sounds less clean than I'd like it to be, FWIW.  Having a trivial
> wrapper in our own code just to avoid an optional argument?
>
> Lars, WDYT?

Yeah, I think kbd could just take the optional parameter.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no