[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency
From: |
Kévin Le Gouguec |
Subject: |
Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:03:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>> I think this inconsistency is unfortunate and unjustified. Can we
>>> please move same-window-prefix to "C-x 4 5" for consistency with the
>>> equivalent frame command?
>>
>> Sorry, I meant "C-x 4 4" and other-window-prefix.
>
> Please explain where do you think is inconsistency.
> 'C-x 4 4' is already bound to 'other-window-prefix'.
IIUC Eli would find C-x 4 5 more consistent for other-window-prefix (I
hope I ran the substitutions correctly; apologies if not).
Personally I like the current arrangement: I think of it as "C-x X X for
other-Y-prefix", with
- X=4 ⇒ Y=window
- X=5 ⇒ Y=frame
- X=t ⇒ Y=tab
I find "mash X to run in new Y" simpler to remember than "press X then 5
to run in new Y".
- "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/09
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/09
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Daniel Martín, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/11
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10