Re: [ELPA] New package: taxy-magit-section

[Stefan Monnier]

> I'd generally be glad to do that.  I did it myself when the README.org
> file is saved because that's necessary for my packages that are on
> MELPA.

I'm not sure what's the benefit of having packages on MELPA when they're
already in GNU ELPA, to be honest.

> I wouldn't mind for ELPA to do that automatically, however there
> is one issue: users who install the package by other means, like with
> Quelpa (as I do for some of my own packages, so I don't have to wait for
> (M)ELPA to build them) or Straight wouldn't get the info manual, IIUC.

They'd need to generate it, just like `elpa-admin.el` would do, indeed.

> So, for now at least, I'd prefer to keep them in the repo and generate
> them myself, if that's acceptable.

It's fully up to you.


        Stefan