Re: Confusing doc string of list-or-string at point

[Stefan Monnier]

>  (defun thing-at-point--end-of-sexp ()
>    "Move point to the end of the current sexp."
> -  (let ((char-syntax (syntax-after (point))))
> +  (let ((char-syntax (char-syntax (char-after))))

Splitting the work between `char-after` and `char-syntax` means that we
can't obey any `syntax-table` text properties placed on that char.
So I think the above change would be a regression in this sense (tho
I understand it fixes or circumvents a bug elsewhere).


        Stefan