[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:40:03 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:31:39 -0400
>
> > By its very nature it is an intrusive package, as it defines functions,
> > macros and advice outside of the "namespace", but I don't see any way
> > around that if transparent compatibility is to be provided (anything
> > else would just replicate dash, s, f, ...).
>
> I think this uncleanliness is a bit risky. Better put the definitions
> in their own namespace. I don't think "transparent compatibility" is
> worth the trouble here, and I don't think `s`, `f`, ... solve the
> same problem.
Can symbol-renaming help here, perhaps? I believe João is trying to
get it ready in time for Emacs 28.
- Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/20
- Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, João Távora, 2021/09/21
- Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/21
- Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, João Távora, 2021/09/21
- Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/09/21