[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers a
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:13:46 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, juri@linkov.net, leungbk@mailfence.com,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:16:10 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > We cannot do anything with some theses "warnings" shown at bootstrap
> > time, so how would it be useful to display warnings there?
>
> I don't get any warnings when saying "make bootstrap"? Which ones are
> you referring to?
Generating loaddefs.el in a clean repository always reports a couple
of prefixes it won't register, and for a good reason.
> >> On the other hand, my personal advice is to use admin/emake, which
> >> filters out all the junk so that you don't have to read anything
> >> carefully. :-)
> >
> > I think this is sub-optimal, at least for active developers of Emacs.
> > No one said a message shown by the build is only important when it's a
> > warning.
>
> emake doesn't filter out everything that's a not a warning, so I don't
> follow you here.
Then I don't understand why you mentioned it.
Juri wants this to be a warning because evidently he disregards (or
maybe actually filters out) anything that isn't a warning or an error
message. That's why I said other messages are also worthy of us
paying attention.
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, (continued)
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Juri Linkov, 2021/07/28
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/29
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Juri Linkov, 2021/07/29
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Juri Linkov, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Juri Linkov, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/07/30
- Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/07/30